AGM Minutes: 2016: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 23:18, 5 May 2017

11th March, 7pm- CLS 2016 OGM

System Vote

Began with a Q and A with system founders Nye, Megan, Lizzie, Joey represented their systems

By general agreement, Broken Worlds [sic] was elected as the next CLS system, with Rosemary Warner as Head Ref and AJ White as head writer and ref. Please contact the current President for a complete breakdown, if interested

During the Counting of votes, the following occurred:

The Treasurer’s Speech

The society is not bankrupt, increasing weekly costs has helped this. For a detailed breakdown, contact the current treasurer.

Motion One: Playtesting

The new CLS system should run a playtest over the Summer. Proposed by the Secretary, Numerous Seconders Passed by unanimous agreement

Motion Two: Merging of mailing lists

The larp-interested and larp-members mailing list should be combined, and should be emailed throughout the year. Proposed by the Secretary, Numerous Seconders There was some debate over the value of keeping them separate, and good points were made on both sides. One point was that larp-interested could be used as an irregular mailing list for those not in Cambridge, however it is not used like this at the moment- this may be a point for a future motion.

Passed by general agreement.

Appointment of Executive Committee

Mark Cooper was elected Secretary by unanimous agreement

Pia Salter was elected President by general agreement

Treasurer for the Society was not elected (as Joey is unable to fill the position next year), so there will be an EGM this term to decide.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-th May, 7pm- CLS 2017 AGM
+th March, 7pm- CLS 2016 OGM
+==System Vote==
-There were 21 Ordinary Members present for the AGM, so the quorum of 15 was met.
+Began with a Q and A with system founders
+Nye, Megan, Lizzie, Joey represented their systems
+By general agreement, Broken Worlds [sic] was elected as the next CLS system, with Rosemary Warner as Head Ref and AJ White as head writer and ref. Please contact the current President for a complete breakdown, if interested
-== 1 Treasurer's Report ==
+During the Counting of votes, the following occurred:
-Accounts can be found [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VjwZ0YIWww0oVBVq7IjTIaUtrVd1xWro59o6qfKfS-s/edit?usp=sharing here].
+==The Treasurer’s Speech==
-The Treasurer said that the Society made a loss of around £300, due to new system costs, lack of availability of cheap rooms and deliberate spending on recruitment. He said that the society still has around £2100 left in the bank however, so finances are okay for the time being.
+The society is not bankrupt, increasing weekly costs has helped this. For a detailed breakdown, contact the current treasurer.
+==Motion One: Playtesting==
-== 2 President's Report ==
+The new CLS system should run a playtest over the Summer.
+Proposed by the Secretary, Numerous Seconders
+Passed by unanimous agreement
+==Motion Two: Merging of mailing lists==
-The President said that everything has gone fairly smoothly this year and there were no big disasters. She also thanked the Secretary for there being rooms and stuff.
+The larp-interested and larp-members mailing list should be combined, and should be emailed throughout the year.
+Proposed by the Secretary, Numerous Seconders
+There was some debate over the value of keeping them separate, and good points were made on both sides. One point was that larp-interested could be used as an irregular mailing list for those not in Cambridge, however it is not used like this at the moment- this may be a point for a future motion.
+Passed by general agreement.
-== 3 Motions for Constitutional Changes ==
+== Appointment of Executive Committee ==
-=== 3.1 Bring Senior Treasurer requirements in line with University rules ===
+Mark Cooper was elected Secretary by unanimous agreement
+Pia Salter was elected President by general agreement
-*Proposed by: Mark Cooper
-*Seconded by: Dan Summers
+Treasurer for the Society was not elected (as Joey is unable to fill the position next year), so there will be an EGM this term to decide.
-Delete "The Senior Treasurer must be a resident member of the Senate or person of MA standing within the University." from the constitution.
-Replace it with "The Senior Treasurer shall be a member of the Regent House or other person approved by the Junior Proctor of the University of Cambridge."
-'''Reasoning''': These are the requirements the University places on the Senior Treasurer, and adding them to the constitution will hopefully prevent us electing a senior treasurer who doesn't meet them again.
-'''''This motion passed unanimously.'''''
-'''The following 2 motions were withdrawn by the proposer after he found an obscure line in the constitution covering the selection of Senior Treasurer.'''
-==== ''3.1a Make the Senior Treasurer an appointed position (withdrawn)''====
-* ''Proposed by: Mark Cooper''
-* ''Seconded by: N/A''
-''Add after the bit about the requirements of the Senior Treasurer:''
-''"The Senior Treasurer shall be appointed by the Exec."''
-'''''Reasoning''': This is less of a faff than 1b.''
-''In the event 1a fails:''
-==== ''3.1b Make the Senior Treasurer an elected position (withdrawn)''====
-* ''Proposed by: Mark Cooper''
-* ''Seconded by: N/A''
-''Add after the bit about the requirements of the Senior Treasurer:''
-''"The Senior Treasurer shall be elected at a General Meeting."''
-=== 3.2 Minor text fixes  ===
-*Proposed by: Mark Cooper
-*Seconded by: Dan Summers
-Essentially this consists of:
-* Fixing misspelt words
-* Specifying units where appropriate
-* Removing unnecessary gendered language
-The changes may be found here:
-https://docs.google.com/document/d/131YTHuO8ekT0tiupxwlOBBxFRdcivxCScu0irb8yemI/edit?usp=sharing
-'''Reasoning''': The constitution is full of typos etc. If we're going to be changing the constitution, we might as well fix them.
-'''Discussion:''' The changes were checked by a Member and deemed reasonable.
-'''''This motion passed unanimously.'''''
-=== 3.3 Introduce a Social Secretary ===
-* Proposed by: Mark Cooper
-* Seconded by: Corin Jeffcock
-Introduce a 4th Exec position, Social Secretary, whose role would be to organise socials and things like weapons practices etc. and help with organising squashes. Amend the constitution accordingly.
-'''Reasoning''':
-* This will reduce the workload of the rest of the Exec, especially the Secretary.
-* It will introduce some useful slack in the system and mean that there is more flexibility for if a member of the Exec needs to reduce the amount they are doing for whatever reason.
-* The job of the secretary is rather diverse, and there is no reason why someone who is good at some of the stuff in the role should be good at all of the stuff. For the right person, Social Secretary would not be a tremendously difficult job.
-* Our Exec is rather small compared to other societies (e.g. Compare with DUTT, who have 5 Exec members (inc. a social secretary), 3 Committee members (and these first 8 are all distinct people), and a bunch of helpers.)
-* It will mean more socials!
-'''Discussion:''' There was considerable discussion, including whether there was a benefit to this being an elected position, and to what extent the Society should run socials.
-'''''This motion passed with 14 of the 21 Members present voting in favour.'''''
-== 4 Appointment of Committee: ==
-'''President'''
-* Kim Ward as President, Corin Jeffcock as Junior President.
-*RON
-'''''Kim and Corin were elected with only Corin voting against.'''''
-'''Treasurer'''
-*Jonathan Cooper
-*RON
-'''''Jon was more popular than RON, and was elected unanimously.'''''
-'''Secretary'''
-* Mark Cooper as Secretary, Robb Smith as Junior Secretary.
-'''''Mark and Robb were elected unanimously.'''''
-== 5 Appointment of next year's Referee Team:  ==
-'''Proposed Refteam''':
-* Rosemary Warner (Head Ref)
-* Nye Redman-White
-* Dan Summers
-* Jon Cooper
-'''''The above Referee Team was approved unanimously.'''''
-== 6 Other Motions: ==
-==== 6.1 Poll on Weekly Finance and Venues ====
-* Proposed by: Jon Cooper
-* Seconded By: N/A because it isn't actually a motion
-An advisory poll for members on how to finance the society's weekly outgoings. This year we've lost a lot of money, and a big reason is because we haven't had access to venues other than the UCH, which is expensive. However some members have expressed a desire to stay in the UCH even if we get access to other venues because of its ease of access. Which of these options would the membership prefer?
-# Stay in the UCH
-# Find a cheaper venue
-In either case, should we find ourselves in the UCH, how do we cover the cost?
-# Raise the weekly fee.
-# Solicit voluntary donations.
-# Something else.
-'''Discussion:''' 'Something else' was replaced with Rosemary Warner's suggestion of a tiered waged/unwaged weekly fee so that people who are able to pay more do. It was mentioned that it may not be possible to move to a cheaper room. It was also mentioned that the UCH reserve Friday evenings preventing last-minute room panics. The option of waiting and seeing how we do next year was discussed. The fact that if we have more money we can buy nice stuff was mentioned.
-'''''The results for each question are below:'''''
-#Stay in the UCH: 10
-#Find a cheaper venue: 8
-# Raise the weekly fee: 1
-# Solicit voluntary donations: 0
-# Introduce a tiered weekly fee: 20
-== 7 Rejoice! ==